Okay, hopefully I got your attention from that title! I found some interesting food for thought, after a colleague mentioned her frustation at exercises systems (including Pilates) becoming closed systems and limiting growth.
You're right -- this isn't exactly a Pilates photo, but this is how I felt about being compelled to teach something that was outdated and not resonating with me. It was a struggle in futility. So I simply moved to another studio which allowed me to teach as I wanted, rather than be required to teach exactly as everyone else taught, when I was disagreeing with the concepts/cues taught about Anatomy, Alignment, even Breathing. A few years later, that Brand caught up with the times, and changed many things -- and I'm so very thankful for that.
A. The original Pilates came from an older understanding of the human body; and one cannot dispute that in almost 100 years, modern science has embraced far more advanced concepts about Anatomy, Physiology, and Kinesiology.
1. We used to have this view just 20 years ago, that muscles connected only to tendons, and that bones connected to bones through ligaments. Well, that is just not accurate. We now understand that ligaments also connect to muscle.
2. We also used to think that ligaments could not regenerate when they were damaged (as compared to tendons and muscle). That is also incorrect today (look up Prolotherapy).
3. We also never even thought about Fascia 20 years ago, and now it's the rage in the fitness and wellness industry.
a. We used to teach that muscles pull, that they shorten and lengthen.
b. Now, we are understanding that muscles may not shorten and lengthen all that much, and that it's the Fascia that's changing. That instead of looking at the human body as having several hundred muscles, that we should instead view the human body as one continuous piece with multiple compartments. (Look up Thomas Myers).
Everything is changing. Rapidly .
B. Moreover, when Joseph Pilates first started teaching, people for the most part led more active lifestyles, with far different lifestyle habits (no cell phones or laptop computers, no drive-thru fast food establishments, and so forth). Moreover, if you look at Joseph Pilates's old videos, you'll see some which leave you questioning whether everyone was moving safely. I'm thinking of one in which he was actively pulling a man's head. Ouch. At any rate, their daily habits were different from ours nearly 100 years later. Our bodies have changed, and so have our needs.
C. As the years went on, Pilates changed from men's fitness, and became synonymous with dance, because it helped dancers heal their bodies from injurious training (which isn't the most sound idea in the first place, but it is a beautiful art).
1. For decades, the field was dominated by dancers who became teachers, and they taught for their own niche market.
2. Nowadays, Pilates is embraced by a much larger community. With the aging populations; surgeries for major joints like knees and hips (requiring more physical therapy); sedentary lifestyles leading to back pain; and of course emerging scientific discoveries, it became advantageous to modernize Pilates and take another look at whether we are doing truly healthy exercise in this country. And to suggest injury-preventive training, as well as rehabilitative, corrective work.
D. An unfortunate development in Pilates was that the discipline became littered with dysfunctional cues based on dysfunctional dance aesthetics. (For example, pressing down the shoulder blades, sucking in the belly at all times, not letting the ribs "pop" when you lift the arms, get taller as you twist the spine, and so forth). Let's take some of these dysfunctional cues and look at them:
1. Keeping the belly sucked in at all times. There are so many things to challenge here:
a. Breathing. Functional, healthy breathing requires that we use our Diaphragm properly, in a way that allows our organs to move the way they're supposed to. That means, letting the belly pooch out, so that the organs move. If you don't do that, then you don't let the Diaphragm go all the way down and fill the lungs properly. This is an easy test.
* Breathe in and let the belly button pooch out. Feel how much you can fill the lungs. Take an exhale, and notice how you feel.
* Now KEEP THAT BELLY BUTTON SUCKED IN. Try to take an inhale. You can't fill the lungs so well, can you? How do you feel mentally? I rest my case.
b. Keeping the belly sucked in at all times was thought to help support the low back. HOWEVER, this will make a person constantly "grip" their abdominal muscles, and produce a weak Psoas Major . A, muscle which directly touches all of the lumbar vertebrae and disks (uh oh, that's the low back), connects to the Pelvis, and also the leg. A muscle which is critical for walking, sitting, standing, and all manner of movement. Oh yes, time to toss out that cue altogether.
2. "Knitting in the ribs at all times, don't let them pop."
a. This is especially dysfunctional when you do spine extension. In an ordinary, non-dancer type person, this will make back-bending a physical impossibility. At best you might go a little bit past vertical. The ribs change when the spine changes, and vice-versa. If you don't let the ribs change, then the spine won't change. It's just common sense. If you want to test me on this, try it out.
b. This cue will also limit range of motion in the shoulder. At the end-range of arm-reaching up into the air, the human skeleton does a little spine extension. So go back to what I said in (2)(a), above. Then try this little experiment.
* Reach your arms up in the air and let the ribs "pop." See how far back you go.
* Now KNIT IN THOSE RIBS AND DON'T LET THEM MOVE. Now try raising your arms and see how far they go.
3. "As you twist the spine, get taller and taller." Well this is just anatomically inaccurate. And it could cause an injury.
a. If you actually did lengthen the spine as you twisted it, you would damage the spine and the spinal cord, which is part of your Central Nervous System.
b. Thankfully you cannot do that. It just isn't how your Facet Joints work in the spine. And, it's a mathematical impossibility, based on the curved shape of the spine.
4. "Slide the shoulders down and back." While this may be intended to tell people not to "shrug" their shoulders, this is a potentially injurious cue.
a. Just try this experiment to see how this cue tends to reduce range of motion with arm-reaching:
* Reach your arm up in the air, without thinking of anything else. Note how high you went.
* Now, SLIDE THAT SHOULDER BLADE DOWN AND BACK. DON'T LET IT BUDGE. And now try reaching the arm up in the air. That's possibly worse than knitting in the ribs. How did your neck feel doing it that way? Ugh.
b. I see a lot of people who misconstrue that well-intentioned cue and "fix" their shoulders, and contract muscles that need to stretch.
c. And if you need further convincing, both Pilates and Yoga are questioning this dangerous cue: http://www.yogajournal.com/teach/alignment-cues-decoded-draw-shoulders-down
Thanks, Eric Franklin, for bringing ALL of this to the forefront years ago! He really opened my eyes, starting in 2010. We were learning about really up to date scientific research, as well as some classic research from the early 1900s that had gone mostly ignored. And a lot of this research raised serious questions about whether Pilates as an industry will need to undergo another dramatic paradigm shift. Including the rehab side.
E. Modern Pilates was not perfect, either. I had long been aware from my days as a Pilates teacher-in-training that what we learned was debated.
1. We didn't hear that in regular teacher training -- although I questioned from time to time, the information I had been hearing in basic teacher training. It conflicted with what I understood in the human body from massage school and from massaging people. I ended up hearing about the debate from their leading physiotherapist at the time, booking private lessons from her, and taking a specialty course that she had been teaching. A year later, a leading Physical Therapist took over the course and came up with a new manual, explaining in more detail what was really going on in the human body. Yet, basic teacher training was still teaching the wrong information! At least at that time, that was the case.
2. So this led me, out of curiosity, to do some research. Apparently, all this modern approach to Pilates started in the late 1990s, after a pair of researchers named Hodges and Richardson published studies about the role of certain muscles in the abdomen and trunk area, and relieving back pain. From there, Core Stabilization/ Core Training exploded within the Health and Wellness industry everything from weight lifting to physical therapy focused on a little abdominal muscle called the Transversus Abdominis
3. While I still have yet to find a definitive retraction, I did find an intriguing article by Hodges in 2008 admitting that its not as simplisitic as once thought. Now thats quite notable, considering that so many people are still acting as if its Absolute Truth. I also found some other articles that are either pro- or against- the ideas we preach about core stability. One asks if its pure stupidity. Yikes! And one article in particular punches holes in all the muscle testing. . .
http://e http://www.alexanderschool.edu.au/the-alexander-technique/articles/76-core-stability?catid=25%3Asports rikdalton.com/media/published-articles/dont-get-married/
I'm not looking at this as if all my previous study of Pilates was a waste (certainly not). I don't need to throw away several years of study. In fact, I'm more than happy to entertain multiple approaches and use the ones that work. Who knows what the scientific research will uncover in the next 20 years? I change with the times and bend like the green bamboo. Or the palm tree in the breeze.
Every few months, it seems that some new weight loss plan, pill, or shake arrives in the market, and perhaps millions of people are moved to try it. Especially when someone triumphantly reports losing a significant amount of weight and going down several pants sizes in a short time, with no exercise!
Is this health ?
Some are even marketed as network marketing. I was once curious about an MLM in 2000 but didnt think much of it after a few meetings. How many times can someone hear eat all the pizza, fries and ice cream you like; take the fat blocker pills, and energy pills; and still lose weight.? Yuck. It just didnt resonate. Well, and then there was a widely publicized news report of the founder dying a month later, from a drug overdose. It just sent me running. And as well, the energy pills had Ephedra, which became a banned substance. I remember looking at boxes of unopened product and threw them all away. Blah.
I was later, in 2012, drawn to another MLM mainly because of a great friend who had an amazing idea about doing fitness videos with other friends in the fitness industry. Now that MLM did stress the importance of balanced eating and exercise, which was great. However -- ummm -- I just really didn't like the product, it didn't taste good to me. And after a couple of months, I couldn't lie to myself. I went back and looked at the things that I wrote back several months earlier and nodded.
So, I am not at all for weight loss shakes. Here's why:
A. The things that always raise personal red flags are artificial sweeteners, Sucralose,and Stevia in the ingredients. I realize its in there because most people looking to lose weight crave the very sweet taste, but they dont want the calories or simple carbs. However, they all have negative health effects.
1. Sucralose is literally sugar combined with chlorine, which I've known for the past 18 months, thanks to a local Naturopath. Heres an article on it, as well as Aspartame. http://www.wnho.net/splenda_chlorocarbon.htm
2. Views are mixed with Stevia. http://www.kitchenstewardship.com/2011/09/22/a-sweet-sweet-summer-what-are-the-facts-on-stevia/ . I just really cant stand the flavor of it. Two of my friends felt sick and got headaches after having a drink with it. And so did I.
B. I believe whole-heartedly in a real food diet which retrains unhealthy thinking and teaches people to be independently successful. Weight management is hard work. Keeping it off for life involves a change of life to make it work. My metabolism is better now than it was in my 20s.
C. Diet clubs and plans
have some initial success. But the long term success is grim. I'm sorry, but it just is. http://www.bigfatfacts.com/
And who hasn't seen those TV shows which pit people in a battle to see who could lose the most weight in a relatively short time? Unfortunately, a lot of them regain weight and/or apprently suffer negative health effects as a result of their ordeal. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2927207/We-fat-Former-Biggest-Loser-contestants-admit-cont...
C. The other thing is: I have a hard time believing that one can lose fat with a weight loss program, without exercise. And by that I mean, body fat percentage. Because fat percentage and activity level are pretty good indicators of health and potential risks. http://www.kellicalabrese.com/Articles/combining-diet-with-exercise.html
The following have been well-recognized for decades now...
1. Most diets without exercise end up with loss of lean muscle, water, even organ tissue; and their body fat percentage can grow higher, even if the weight goes down.
2. As a result of weight loss by calorie restriction, the metabolism ends up compromised and holds onto body fat even more tightly. So, if someone falls off the wagon so to speak and gains weight, they gain back a lot more fat. One need only look at well publicized figures to recognize how easy it is to fall into the yo-yo cycle. This fat storage is apparently built into our DNA. Our ancestors faced periods of famine and also trekked by land and sea to populate new areas, so they had to be efficient to survive. Can I do this with even less effort, less energy expenditure? Sure, I'll lower the metabolism so I don't have to eat as much. Sorted.
3. When people are claiming to lose fat, are they talking about measurable, documented fat percentage loss? Or are they just looking at a change in the scale, or the loss of pants sizes and assuming that its all fat? The most reliable measurement of fat percentage is the hydostatic tests. The next most reliable are calipers if done correctly. Those hand held biomechanical impedence things are wildly variable. Like by 4-5 percentage points.
And related material:
Pardon me for getting really steamed, but it really irks me to see advertisements that promise that you'll get "fit" in only 30 days, whether its a pill or a workout.
What a load of . . . well I'm going to use my internal editor to not use the words I'd like to use right now. In this case, Im steaming about a health club advertising a 30 day, 7 days a week Boot Camp. Sounds like a perfect opportunity to get a stress fracture, inflexible joints (including spine), and perhaps a knee injury. Especially for those folks 30 and over.
Fit in what way?
Perhaps someone who goes all out for 30 days will lose a few pounds. But there is no way that the body can maintain such a punishing regime. It's a recipe for an overuse injury, which could manifest within the 30 days or after.
And when (not if) that injury hits, it will sideline you and cause the usual collateral damage: (1) Weight gain often happens, (2) Frustration, depression, lowered self-esteem, (3) Some people give up; (4) Others may develop eating disorders, particularly women; (5) Still others return to exercise before they have finished healing and set up a chronic injury/pain situation.
7 days a week is never recommended for us normal folks, unless its some kind of flexibility training. (Now that would fall within the guidelines of the Aerobics and Fitness Association of America). The people who might fall outside of that are ELITE and YOUNG athletes. But even then, I've seen Cirque du Soleil/Shanghai Circus acrobats hobbling about with ice packs strapped on to this and that body part, getting right to work. And I have also seen elite dancers in some constant state of pain. (Which is why Im so enamored with the Franklin Method®, especially for these folks!)
Well then, we normal folks ought to be taking at least one day of rest per week AT THE LEAST. If you find yourself feeling stiff or developing pain, your body is giving a clear signal to slow down, and figure out whats going on.
Fitness is a lifestyle, its not something you can obtain quickly. There are many facets to physical fitness including core strength, flexibility, balance, coordination, and control. Then, there is overall health which includes your energy level; blood work (HDLs, blood sugar, all that good stuff); emotional and mental health; diet (yeah, we cant make up for the pizza, fries and beer with a big workout and nothing but broccoli the next day. Dont laugh, I knew plenty of friends in college who did that every weekend).
And if you are new to exercise, or took a long hiatus because of life circumstances, you deserve to treat yourself well. Start with a doctor checkup to rule out any cautionary measures and jump joyfully into some brisk walking, swimming, or other low-impact exercise. Grab a friend. Take in an appropriate level Pilates or Yoga class. Learn proper body mechanics to prevent injury.
Whenever I see people hobbling about and saying how great their workouts have been, I want to cringe. Want some Ibuprofen with that?
Wouldnt you like to experience instead, that workout in a more joyous, elastic, energetic way and go back to feeling as if you were a kid again? If so, call me; and if Im too far away I can most likely find someone in your area.
Anyway, thats my rant for today. Im totally against get-thin-fast and get-fit-fast regimes. Do it the old-fashioned way: with patience, and focus -- and retraining the brain to think healthy for life. Your body and brain will love you for it.
Hello there! In late 2011, I delved into juicing vegetable, and have been doing so ever since. It's now been over six years. I have never felt more vibrant, and long-time friends have also pointed this out. My skin has improved, hair has gotten softer, and energy shooting through the roof. It actually moved me to plant some garden vegetables, particularly lettuce, beets, carrots, kale, and spinach.
And how fun
is that to grow your own organic produce, and know that all your good
intentions are going right back into your body!
I have been reading, and re-reading the book by Norman Walker, the inventor of the Norwalk juicer. (ISBN 0-89019006704). Its been in print since 1936. Source: Walker, N.W. (D. Sc.), Fresh Vegetable and Fruit Juices: What's Missing In Your Body? (Prescott, AZ: Norwalk Press, 1970).
Boy, one of the first things that came to mind was: This book was written before most of our modern vaccinations and pharmaceuticals. Remedies seemed to come from food. And back then, everything was organic. That part definintely resonates with me. Well, I'm not going to completely poo-poo modern medicine, however -- as I do believe science has achieved fantastic things on the one hand. On the other hand, I personally will avoid taking pharmaceuticals and undergoing surgery for injuries/conditions, unless it's necessary. But I also know when it's prudent to go get a diagnosis, go to the ER, etc.
Dr. Walker has some really valuable information on the benefits of several vegetables, including the idea that you will rapidly assimilate the nutrients and can cleanse your digestive tract, This is all from his book, by the way:
Carrots : You may already know that they are rich in Vitamin A they also supply us with vitamins B, C, D, E, G, and K and is an aid to digestion. (page 33). Moreover, Dr. Walker writes that the carrot juice molecule is exactly analogous to that of the blood molecule, (page 39), which goes along with the traditional thought in India (Ayurveda), that carrots build the blood. (Oh, by the way, Im an Ayurvedic practitioner as well).
Celery : Its high in organic sodium, an important electrolyte. (page 41) In fact, Im rather fond of apple and celery juice with a squeeze of lemon. Its quite refreshing in the summer. Id like to add here that a traditional Ayurvedic electrolyte drink contains lemon, salt, and raw sugar or honey in warm water. Why do we need electrolytes? For proper muscle function, among many other things. If youve ever gotten dehydrated with muscle cramping from exercise (say hot yoga or exercise or a day out in the desert), its quite likely that you need electrolytes. An overload of water isnt going to balance you out in fact, it could cause other illness like hyponatremia.
Cucumber : Probably the best natural diuretic known, secreting and promoting the flow of urine. (page 43). Its also a rich source of minerals including potassium (another electrolyte).
Dandelion Juice is apparently a valuable tonic to counteract hyperacidity, in his opinion, and is also high in magnesium, calcium, potassium, iron, and sodium. (page 44).
Lettuce is said to benefit the blood, muscular tissues, brain, and nerves (page 51). Romaine lettuce in particular is said to maintain healthy amounts of adrenaline in the system (page 52).
Parsley : This herb, it seems, should be combined with other juices rather than be taken alone. Apparently, the combination of parsley with beet, carrot, and cucumber is supposed to relieve menstrual cramps, but he doesnt give a recipe in this book (p. 55). Id be curious to know if any of you out there have tried this and what your experience is? I dont get cramps, but Id probably take this tonic mix for nutritional reasons.
Sorrel : It looks like a type of spinach, Im growing some. The juice is supposed to re-establish normal function of the intestines. (page 59). Spinach in general benefits the entire digestive tract. And I might add, in this writers opinion, its quite delicious mixed with carrot juice.
Source: Walker, N.W. (D. Sc.), Fresh Vegetable and Fruit Juices: What's Missing In Your Body?
(Prescott, AZ: Norwalk Press, 1970).
That said, I'd caution you wonderful readers from going overboard and juicing many pints a day, at least not without consulting a trusted health professional. One of my teachers strongly cautioned that you could send yourself into a " healing crisis " by rapidly de-toxifying the body. If you're a decently healthy eater who exercises, you probably have less to worry about than a sedentary person who has subsisted on junk-food for years and then suddenly decides to do a juice fast (yikes).
When I started, I only took about 12 ounces of juice daily. I did notice in the first few days that a big pimple appeared after the first intake of juice. It did not stay long. Now I would average more like 32 oz. of vegetable juice daily, more in the summer (Ohhh, I love cucumber juice to cool myself down, and also enjoyed making watermelon-cherry juice and bringing it to cheer on my boyfriend and his family at the canoe regattas in the summer of 2016). And I have been known to down up to 64 oz. of vegetable juice on occasion. Personally, I have found it amazingly beneficial for my own sense of well-being.
DISCLAIMER : I also want to add that this should not be taken as medical or "healing" advice, and this Blog is not intended to diagnose, treat, or cure disease. None of the statements have been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. And -- I'm not a dietician -- merely quoting Dr. Walker's book and providing an educational resource.
Now then, if you feel so moved to buy a juicer, you might balk at the cost of a Norwalk, even a used one. And I'm not a salesperson for any juicer company. If you're just starting out, or concerned about cost, then you'll likely be happiest with the inexpensive models that are easily found at the store. But once you're serious, or once you try a friend's Norwalk, you will find that their juicer lasts for a very long time.
A word about juice bars: Generally, I have found that they leave a bit of fiber left in the juice -- which is fine if you like the fiber. For my purposes, I only want the juice, it's part of my training. I also don't want my carrot-cucumber-celery-parsley juice to have the taste of pineapple and garlic -- which is what usually happens at juice bars unless they have the time to clean the juicer in between customers. I've got a sharp sense of taste and smell, so even if it's just a trace, yeah I can tell. Sometimes staff will have time to do this, and they are awesome for that. When they can do thta, then yes they produce a wonderful juice. But it's also a lot more expensive than making my own at home.
If you are an avid juicer, Id love to hear from you!
a. "Balances hormones"
b. "Relieves stress "
c. "Reduces depression "
d. "Minimizes inflammation"
e. "Improves circulation"
f. "Alleviates the effects of menopause"
g. "Improves dental health"
h. "Reduces blood pressure "
i. "Benefits the health of your skin"
j. "Improves dental health"
This was an interesting tidbit -- I have not had personal experience using Geranium oil this way, but I might try. Dr. Axe says that geranium oil may be used to tone muscles and reduce the appearance of wrinkles (heyyyy), and he indicates: "Add two drops of geranium oil to your face lotion and apply it twice daily," and also: "Create a massage oil by mixing five drops of geranium oil with one tablespoon of jojoba oil and massage it into your skin, focusing on your muscles." You can see his article here: https://draxe.com/10-geranium-oils-benefits-healthy-skin-much/
According to Dr. Mercola : “Geranium oil is often compared to the rose essential oil because they share almost the same therapeutic traits. In fact, geranium is considered the "poor man's rose" and its oil is often the alternative to the more expensive rose oil.” http://articles.mercola.com/herbal-oils/geranium-oil.aspx . So then, you might want to cross-reference my Blog entry on Rose essential oil, as it cites a number of sources: http://www.lahelafit.com/feeling-that-rosy-glow . Interestingly, Dr. Mercola agrees on a lot of the same uses as listed by Dr. Axe. Again, no personal experience there, but I will try a spa experiment on myself, when my shipment of Geranium arrives. Hee hee!
Dr. Mercola also says something that I can agree in my own experience from diffusing, that: "The essential oil can also aid in uplifting mood, lessening fatigue and promoting emotional wellness." http://articles.mercola.com/herbal-oils/geranium-oil.aspx . That said: I have a client who is sensitive/allergic to a lot of things. For example, fresh flowers and pine (like Christmas decorations) in the studio can cause respiratory distress. I constantly have a bit of peppermint on me for every session because it generally will clear her up, and every time we enter the studio I scan the rooms to see if there are any flowers to put away. (See another blog entry on peppermint: http://www.lahelafit.com/delicious-peppermint ). BUT she is not affected that way from geranium essential oil being diffused by the studio owner. Hooray!
Essential oils are used in 3 ways :
1) Aromatically -- for example, diffused or sprayed into the air. You'd also be smelling the essential oils applied to your skin, as in a massage.
2) Topically -- applied onto the skin or hair perhaps. But not to be applied to mucous membranes. Definitely keep away from the eyes and sensitive body parts. When applied to the skin , they are “easily absorbed” and “transported throughout the body” via the blood stream – you can illustrate this by rubbing a clove of garlic on your feet, and notice garlic breath. Lawless, Julia. The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Essential Oils (UK, USA, AUS: Element Books, 1995), pp. 22-23.
3) Internally . This is a somewhat controversial subject -- and I don't actually know anyone who ingests Geranium oil, specifically. At any rate, I added a discussion below.
FOR INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL USE?
I support external use as long as someone doesn't have a known allergy to any particular essential oil. As for internal use, essential oils are super-concentrated, so it's a controversial subject. While you can find all sorts of blogs either for or against, I found this notable quote from Dr. Eric Z.:
'I regularly get questions from people asking me about internal use and I now understand why there's so much confusion. One myth breeds more myths. Innocent uncertainty breeds more uncertainty. And the vicious cycle continues.
The fact remains that there are no scientific, evidence-based, anatomical, physiological or logical reasons to say that essentials oils are unsafe for human consumption. Paradoxically, aromatherapists are still at odds with each other on this point, which confuses the casual essential oil user all the more. With that said, rest assured that large professional organizations like National Association for Holistic Aromatherapy (NAHA) support safe, internal use.
In the words of NAHA, “Essential oils may be applied on the skin (dermal application), inhaled, diffused or taken internally. Each of these methods have safety issues which need to be considered.” ( 1 ) And this makes complete sense to me. Like anything we can easily overdo it, and we must remember a little goes a long way with regard to essential oils – especially internal use! We can also find several local and online schools that will certify you as an aromatherapist and learn how to practice safe, internal use.
The Atlantic Institute of Aromatherapy is one organization in particular that I have strongly aligned myself with as it is the oldest aromatherapy school continually run by a practicing aromatherapist. Their founder, Sylla Sheppard-Hanger, has over 40 years of client-based experience, and has been teaching classes in aromatherapy since 1985. The bottom line is that when an organization like this includes together internal use guidelines in their curriculum – with hundreds of case studies to support their recommendations – people should stop for a second a listen, don't you agree?
And let's not forget what the universally acclaimed text, Essential Oil Safety: A Guide for Health Care Professionals , repeatedly refers to “maximum oral dose” in relation to consuming essential oils safely and effectively.
The thing that really throws me through a loop regarding people who speak out against internal use is that they are in direct opposition of the several human studies in the scientific literature and completely disregard the Food and Drug Administration. Yes, you read that correctly! According to the FDA, essential oils are safe for human consumption. " http://drericz.com/are-essential-oils-safe-for-internal-use/ .
And Dr. Eric Z provides this link:
. He goes on to list the essential oils "Generally Regarded As Safe" (GRAS):
"Essential oils, oleoresins (solvent-free), and natural extractives (including distillates) that are generally recognized as safe for their intended use, within the meaning of section 409 of the Act, are as follows:
|Common name||Botanical name of plant source|
|Alfalfa||Medicago sativa L.|
|Allspice||Pimenta officinalis Lindl.|
|Almond, bitter (free from prussic acid)||Prunus amygdalus Batsch, Prunus armeniaca L., or Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.|
|Ambrette (seed)||Hibiscus moschatus Moench.|
|Angelica root||Angelica archangelica L.|
|Angostura (cusparia bark)||Galipea officinalis Hancock.|
|Anise||Pimpinella anisum L.|
|Asafetida||Ferula assa-foetida L. and related spp. of Ferula.|
|Balm (lemon balm)||Melissa officinalis L.|
|Balsam of Peru||Myroxylon pereirae Klotzsch.|
|Basil||Ocimum basilicum L.|
|Bay leaves||Laurus nobilis L.|
|Bay (myrcia oil)||Pimenta racemosa (Mill.) J. W. Moore.|
|Bergamot (bergamot orange)||Citrus aurantium L. subsp. bergamia Wright et Arn.|
|Bitter almond (free from prussic acid)||Prunus amygdalus Batsch, Prunus armeniaca L., or Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.|
|Bois de rose||Aniba rosaeodora Ducke.|
|Cacao||Theobroma cacao L.|
|Camomile (chamomile) flowers, Hungarian||Matricaria chamomilla L.|
|Camomile (chamomile) flowers, Roman or English||Anthemis nobilis L.|
|Cananga||Cananga odorata Hook. f. and Thoms.|
|Capsicum||Capsicum frutescens L. and Capsicum annuum L.|
|Caraway||Carum carvi L.|
|Cardamom seed (cardamon)||Elettaria cardamomum Maton.|
|Carob bean||Ceratonia siliqua L.|
|Carrot||Daucus carota L.|
|Cascarilla bark||Croton eluteria Benn.|
|Cassia bark, Chinese||Cinnamomum cassia Blume.|
|Cassia bark, Padang or Batavia||Cinnamomum burmanni Blume.|
|Cassia bark, Saigon||Cinnamomum loureirii Nees.|
|Celery seed||Apium graveolens L.|
|Cherry, wild, bark||Prunus serotina Ehrh.|
|Chervil||Anthriscus cerefolium (L.) Hoffm.|
|Chicory||Cichorium intybus L.|
|Cinnamon bark, Ceylon||Cinnamomum zeylanicum Nees.|
|Cinnamon bark, Chinese||Cinnamomum cassia Blume.|
|Cinnamon bark, Saigon||Cinnamomum loureirii Nees.|
|Cinnamon leaf, Ceylon||Cinnamomum zeylanicum Nees.|
|Cinnamon leaf, Chinese||Cinnamomum cassia Blume.|
|Cinnamon leaf, Saigon||Cinnamomum loureirii Nees.|
|Citronella||Cymbopogon nardus Rendle.|
|Citrus peels||Citrus spp.|
|Clary (clary sage)||Salvia sclarea L.|
|Coca (decocainized)||Erythroxylum coca Lam. and other spp. of Erythroxylum.|
|Cola nut||Cola acuminata Schott and Endl., and other spp. of Cola.|
|Coriander||Coriandrum sativum L.|
|Cumin (cummin)||Cuminum cyminum L.|
|Curacao orange peel (orange, bitter peel)||Citrus aurantium L.|
|Cusparia bark||Galipea officinalis Hancock.|
|Dandelion||Taraxacum officinale Weber and T. laevigatum DC.|
|Dog grass (quackgrass, triticum)||Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.|
|Elder flowers||Sambucus canadensis L. and S. nigra I.|
|Estragole (esdragol, esdragon, tarragon)||Artemisia dracunculus L.|
|Fennel, sweet||Foeniculum vulgare Mill.|
|Fenugreek||Trigonella foenum-graecum L.|
|Galanga (galangal)||Alpinia officinarum Hance.|
|Geranium, East Indian||Cymbopogon martini Stapf.|
|Geranium, rose||Pelargonium graveolens L'Her.|
|Ginger||Zingiber officinale Rosc.|
|Grapefruit||Citrus paradisi Macf.|
|Hickory bark||Carya spp.|
|Horehound (hoarhound)||Marrubium vulgare L.|
|Hops||Humulus lupulus L.|
|Horsemint||Monarda punctata L.|
|Hyssop||Hyssopus officinalis L.|
|Immortelle||Helichrysum augustifolium DC.|
|Jasmine||Jasminum officinale L. and other spp. of Jasminum.|
|Juniper (berries)||Juniperus communis L.|
|Kola nut||Cola acuminata Schott and Endl., and other spp. of Cola.|
|Laurel berries||Laurus nobilis L.|
|Laurel leaves||Laurus spp.|
|Lavender||Lavandula officinalis Chaix.|
|Lavender, spike||Lavandula latifolia Vill.|
|Lavandin||Hybrids between Lavandula officinalis Chaix and Lavandula latifolin Vill.|
|Lemon||Citrus limon (L.) Burm. f.|
|Lemon balm (see balm)|
|Lemon grass||Cymbopogon citratus DC. and Cymbopogon lexuosus Stapf.|
|Lemon peel||Citrus limon (L.) Burm. f.|
|Lime||Citrus aurantifolia Swingle.|
|Linden flowers||Tilia spp.|
|Locust bean||Ceratonia siliqua L,|
|Lupulin||Humulus lupulus L.|
|Mace||Myristica fragrans Houtt.|
|Mandarin||Citrus reticulata Blanco.|
|Marjoram, sweet||Majorana hortensis Moench.|
|Mate||Ilex paraguariensis St. Hil.|
|Melissa (see balm)|
|Molasses (extract)||Saccarum officinarum L.|
|Naringin||Citrus paradisi Macf.|
|Neroli, bigarade||Citrus aurantium L.|
|Nutmeg||Myristica fragrans Houtt.|
|Onion||Allium cepa L.|
|Orange, bitter, flowers||Citrus aurantium L.|
|Orange, bitter, peel||Do.|
|Orange leaf||Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck.|
|Orange, sweet, flowers||Do.|
|Orange, sweet, peel||Do.|
|Palmarosa||Cymbopogon martini Stapf.|
|Paprika||Capsicum annuum L.|
|Parsley||Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Mansf.|
|Pepper, black||Piper nigrum L.|
|Peppermint||Mentha piperita L.|
|Peruvian balsam||Myroxylon pereirae Klotzsch.|
|Petitgrain||Citrus aurantium L.|
|Petitgrain lemon||Citrus limon (L.) Burm. f.|
|Petitgrain mandarin or tangerine||Citrus reticulata Blanco.|
|Pimenta||Pimenta officinalis Lindl.|
|Pimenta leaf||Pimenta officinalis Lindl.|
|Pipsissewa leaves||Chimaphila umbellata Nutt.|
|Pomegranate||Punica granatum L.|
|Prickly ash bark||Xanthoxylum (or Zanthoxylum) Americanum Mill. or Xanthoxylum clava-herculis L.|
|Rose absolute||Rosa alba L., Rosa centifolia L., Rosa damascena Mill., Rosa gallica L., and vars. of these spp.|
|Rose (otto of roses, attar of roses)||Do.|
|Rose fruit (hips)||Do.|
|Rose geranium||Pelargonium graveolens L'Her.|
|Rose leaves||Rosa spp.|
|Rosemary||Rosmarinus officinalis L.|
|Saffron||Crocus sativus L.|
|Sage||Salvia officinalis L.|
|Sage, Greek||Salvia triloba L.|
|Sage, Spanish||Salvia lavandulaefolia Vahl.|
|St. John's bread||Ceratonia siliqua L.|
|Savory, summer||Satureia hortensis L.|
|Savory, winter||Satureia montana L.|
|Schinus molle||Schinus molle L.|
|Sloe berries (blackthorn berries)||Prunus spinosa L.|
|Spearmint||Mentha spicata L.|
|Spike lavender||Lavandula latifolia Vill.|
|Tamarind||Tamarindus indica L.|
|Tangerine||Citrus reticulata Blanco.|
|Tarragon||Artemisia dracunculus L.|
|Tea||Thea sinensis L.|
|Thyme||Thymus vulgaris L. and Thymus zygis var. gracilis Boiss.|
|Thyme, wild or creeping||Thymus serpyllum L.|
|Triticum (see dog grass)|
|Tuberose||Polianthes tuberosa L.|
|Turmeric||Curcuma longa L.|
|Vanilla||Vanilla planifolia Andr. or Vanilla tahitensis J. W. Moore.|
|Violet flowers||Viola odorata L.|
|Violet leaves absolute||Do.|
|Wild cherry bark||Prunus serotina Ehrh.|
|Ylang-ylang||Cananga odorata Hook. f. and Thoms.|
|Zedoary bark||Curcuma zedoaria Rosc.|
[42 FR 14640, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 44 FR 3963, Jan. 19, 1979; 47 FR 29953, July 9, 1982; 48 FR 51613, Nov. 10, 1983; 50 FR 21043 and 21044, May 22, 1985]"
You can read the entire article here: http://drericz.com/are-essential-oils-safe-for-internal-use/ .
Update: 5/5/17. Well, I just made a number of fun essential oil blends with a friend/mentor, and one was a "Love" mixture which included Geranium. I do love the combined scent and mixed it in a cute little applicator for perfume. Looking forward to trying it out and seeing what that particular blend does for me. The awesome thing is that you really don't need a whole lot to make a perfume, so a few 5ml bottles last quite a while.
I also notice that some companies' geranium doesn't have as nice of an aroma as others. I'm not sure if it's a matter of purity, or just the sourcing. But I do love the scent of geranium bydōTERRA® . One of several reasons I love this company is because of their Cō-Impact Sourcing®. dōTERRA® sources its oils from all over the world so that each oil is derived from its indigenous environment. I like the fact that the plants are grown and harvested in the proper altitude, climate, seasons, and soil, for them to thrive.
: None of these statements have been evaluated by the FDA. None of this is intended as medical or "healing" advice. Nor is this intended as a substitute for medical care. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, or cure disease.
If you're now curious about Geranium essential oil, want to find a diffuser, or perhaps some fractionated coconut oil to help you apply your essential oils on the skin, have fun browsing around at: www.mydoterra/lahelafit . Feel free to shoot me a message as well, through my website: www.lahelafit.com .